Ask Matt: Question from Pat

Pat asks:

Why are you such a llammah?

Well, googling “llammah” shows a link to my blog as the second result.  And well, if it’s in Google then it must be true.

Note: This is part of the Ask Matt series where you, the reader, get to post a question and have me answer it.

Ask Matt: Question from Jeremy

Jeremy asks:

If you were asked to launch a major political movement, what would the platform look like?

As I said to Jeremy in an IM after reading his comment, “good grief Jeremy.”   I’ll make an attempt at tackling the question though.

I think the 10th amendment to the U.S. Constitution needs to be read and remembered by everyone.  Here’s what it says:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

It’s important to realize what that means.  I’m no political scholar, but how I interpret it is this:  Any powers not given to the government belong to the people.  So in essence, the people have all the power, and the government only has those powers which the people give it.  This is a very important foundation in my opinion and sadly one that is all too often forgotten by we the people.  That’s not necessarily answering Jeremy’s question, but it is important to point out for the purpose of conveying my mindset.

I asked Jeremy if this was intended to be as if I was running for office or if I was just planning to lobby for causes.  He responded, “the hypothetical is less important than just what are your priorities.”  It still stays a very open ended question, so I’m going to narrow it down a little.  For one, I’m going to take this from a national perspective, and two, I’m going to limit it to three priorities.

Here are three priorities I would want to pursue:

  • No more bail-outs.  We’re completely killing any chance of the “free-market” working with these.  I don’t have access to the exact quote, but a BB&T executive spoke out against the financial sector bail out when it was being proposed.  What I remember from the quote, he basically said please don’t bail these companies out.  BB&T is secure because it didn’t engage in the risky lending practices, and by bailing out those companies that did, you are giving BB&T’s competition an unfair advantage in the market.  We need some darwanism.  I understand that this would likely mean rough (potentially very rough) times in the near future, but I soundly believe that it would be better in the long term.  If I could recall the previous bail-outs, I would.
  • Investments in alternative energy sources.  Look, if you think we’re ok relying so heavily on oil/coal … please come out from under your rock and join me in the real world.  I don’t believe there’s a silver bullet for alternative energy, at least not in a country the size of the United States.  We’ll need a good mix of multiple sources from solar, to hydro, to geothermal, to wind.  The most efficient method should be used in its respective geographic area of the country.  This should have been done long ago.
  • Finally, I would push for a return to states rights.  I’m not looking to start a secession movement, so please don’t mistake my comment.  However I am starting to believe that governing micro issues on a national level is both hugely inefficient and not very realistic.  We are a diverse nation and Region X is being forced to succumb to the needs of Region Y even when the needs of Region Y do not concern Region X.  One of the ideals this country was founded on was more or less, “live how you want, just don’t piss in someone else’s cereal.”  We shouldn’t be forcing personal beliefs on one another.

Anyhow … I hope that answers your question Jeremy.

Note: This is part of the Ask Matt series where you, the reader, get to post a question and have me answer it.

Ask Matt: Question from Kate

Kate “the Great” Ray asks:

An executive drove from home at an average speed of 30 mph to an airport where a helicopter was waiting. The executive boarded the helicopter and flew to the corporate offices at an average speed of 60 mph. The entire distance was 150 miles; the entire trip took three hours. What is the distance from the airport to the corporate offices?

I believe the distance from the airport to the corporate offices is 120 miles.  If the entire trip (including driving and flying time) took three hours, that allows him to drive 30 miles for one hour at 30 mph, leaving 120 miles left.  Since the helicopter flew at 60 mph, it could cover the 120 miles remaining in two hours, adding up to the full three hours the trip took.

However, this doesn’t account for the time it took him to change from the car to the helicopter, so you’d either need to supply that information, or accept that he really knows how to hustle from his car to the helicopter … or he can suspend time.  In either case, I’d like to meet that business man.

Note: This is part of the Ask Matt series where you, the reader, get to post a question and have me answer it.

Ask Matt: Question from Bobby

Bobby asks:

If you could have any one thing for Christmas, or be in any one new place, or meet any one person….what/where/who and for what reason.

Thanks for the question Bobby, I’ll answer all 3 parts.

Thing for Christmas
I’m going to take the somewhat selfish approach in answering this question.  No world peace type of an answer here ;)  I would probably most want a Drobo unit.  I really like how the unit doesn’t require you use the same sized disks in the RAID and that it can run applications built specifically for the Drobo, basically allowing you to turn it into a mini server on your network.  It’s not cheap, but it’s feature set is also unmatched.

New Place
Narrowing this down to one is tough.  There are many places both domestically and internationally that I would like to visit.  However, if I’m forced to narrow it down to one it would be Ireland.  A lot of my family heritage comes from Ireland and I’ve wanted to visit there for a long time.  On my mom’s side, where most of my Irish heritage comes from, we’ve been in the states for quite some time (apparently I have an ancestor with a statue somewhere for fighting in the revolutionary war).  Because of that, it’s not like I’d really be reuniting with long lost family members.  However it would still be interesting to see where we came from.

Meet Person
I’m actually having a real hard time answering this.  I wouldn’t mind actually meeting Pat.  He and I have been friends for years now.  I think I met him around 1995 maybe?  We’ve never actually met face to face though.  And we’ve probably only talked verbally (as in phone or VOIP) for a total of 1-1.5 hours.  I consider him a good/close friend though, so it’d be cool to grab a beer or something.

Note: This is part of the Ask Matt series where you, the reader, get to post a question and have me answer it.

Ask Matt: Question from Jason

Jason asks:

Barack Obama was elected on a push for “change” and no more “politics as usual” yet he’s stacked his cabinet with old faces and names, the usual politicians, and pulled a lot of people from Chicago which still has a reputation as being less than stellar. So does this mean pumpkin pie will be any less delicious?

Well, I pretty much knew you or Jeremy (or both, it remains to be seen) would take this opportunity to get me to discuss politics, but as I said, no question is out of bounds.

Barack Obama, for better or worse, had/has a monsterous marketing machine (m3) operating for his campaign.  It’s no secret that Americans were crying out for “change” after the last 8 years we’ve seen with President Bush.  So the m3 latched onto this and made it their battle cry.  What remains to be seen is whether they’ll live up to it.  Many different “special” interest groups seem concerned over what he will be trying to tackle during his presidency.

Gun owners, for instance, are up in arms over him “understanding” the second ammendment.  He very obviously intended comments such as those to sway gun owners into believing he would not act to take away any of their current rights.  However, his voting record clearly states differently.

Then there are issues such as what you bring up.  I’m not an expert on Illinois poltics, however you don’t have to look very far back in history to see that it is ripe with corruption.  If Blagojevich is convicted, I believe he will be the 4th Illinois governor in recent history to be convicted of a white collar crime.  I’m not implying that President Elect Obama had anything to do with the sale of his Senate seat, however, pulling from that pool of individuals might not be the best idea at the moment for his campaign.

I do believe that some of the scare/concern over Obama is unfounded.  When it really comes down to it, he’s one part of the system.  He cannot, on his own, enact all the change he has promised.  He won’t be able to single handedly turn the economy around, or have our troops home tomorrow.  However I am concerned about the morale of the American people once they realize this.

That all being said, I recommend you check out one of these pumpkin pie recipes to make sure it is, in fact, delicious.

Note: This is part of the Ask Matt series where you, the reader, get to post a question and have me answer it.

Ask Matt – Ep 1

Jason has been running this for the past couple of weeks, and I think it’s a pretty neat idea.  I know I don’t have tons of readers these days since I went so long without posting consistently, but I’m trying to change that now.

So anyhow, here’s your chance.  Ask me anything you want in the comments and I will give you an answer.  It can be anything from PHP to Politics to Cats.  There’s no question that is unacceptable.

I look forward to hearing from you.